Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think it is better to work for different organisations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Many do not want to change their job and are inclined to spend their entire working age at the same company. Others, however, believe that working for different companies is better for rapid career progression. I do also believe that switching job for better opportunity is a good idea.
First of all, those who are not in favour of job switch, believe that working in a same organisation is better. Because, it helps us to be accustomed with the corporate culture of that specific organisation. By stating this, they mean that employee find it difficult to cope up with new corporate cultures when they frequently change their companies as different organisation have different corporate environment. Beside these, working in a same organisation for lifetime could help an employee to hone and ameliorate his specific expertise which is essential for career progression. However, the reality is quite different. For example, before 10 years ago some of my friends joined in a same company in similar positions. All of them switched their jobs several times except one who decided to remain in the same company. As of today, those of my friends who switched their job have reached to managerial levels with attractive financial packages, while the last one is still holding the same position without any significant salary enhancement. So, staying at the same company for lifetime is not a good idea for career development.
On the other hand, the other group who believe it is better to switch a job for higher position with attractive financial packages, claim that switching company offers an employee to develop new sets of skills and enhance the adaptation powers. On contrary, working in the same organisation for lifelong prevents and employee to learn new things which is actually a digression. Beside these, it is against progressiveness and bound to be monotonous after a certain period of time. In addition of these, the salary and position progression could be slow down for them who stay in the same company. On top of it, they might be so used to with the particular culture that it could make them reluctant to accept new things and ideas.
In conclusion, even though, working for a certain organisation for lifetime has some benefits like specific skill development, but for Rapid career growth it is better to grab the new opportunities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rking in a same organisation is better. Because, it helps us to be accustomed with the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... bound to be monotonous after a certain period of time. In addition of these, the salary and p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...nous after a certain period of time. In addition of these, the salary and position progr...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, so, still, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0358056266 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83200015551 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485933503836 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 629.1 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9032054293 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.388888889 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7222222222 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27777777778 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323765328696 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114729167169 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882000152128 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236343538897 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442310034637 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.