Some say that reading newspapers and watching TV news is a waste of time, because it has no direct connection with people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Newspapers, TV news channels are earmarked to get the update what is happening in the world. However, some people believe that reading newspaper or watching news on TV utterly waste of time, as these modes do not have any straight link with individual's life. But as I per my opinion I am strongly disagree with this thought, because these communication channels have widespread they sources and able to know about the any incident which has happened far away from our reach. In this essay I will discuss the points which will highlight the positive impact of newspapers and TV channels on our life.

These are few points which much be consider which makes TV news channels and newspapers essential for us. Firstly, point is these methods use enormously high manpower and latest technology to get the catch the information about any incident happen. Secondly, they have offices and reporters spread entire the world which makes them to access not not big cities also small towns and villages. For an instance, Nowadays, most of the TV channels in India requiting the reporter from different cities and region so that they can get all the news as soon as possible. Therefore, newspapers and TV channel are good opinion to get updates about the things happening surrounded to us.

Even though, Internet, radio news and social media are also available sources to get news, but these do not consist any source or authenticity of news. For example, to broadcast any news on the TV or newspapers responsible authorities are validate the truthfulness of news , but in case of internet or social media there is no accountability if news is fake or forged.
So, considering all the scenarios, Newspapers and TV channels are more reliable compared with others.

To concluded, As this essay discussed about the cases that TV channels and newspapers are quite old sources used by our society, still these are more reliable and effective ways.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
.... But as I per my opinion I am strongly disagree with this thought, because these commun...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ht, because these communication channels have widespread they sources and able to...
^^
Line 1, column 385, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'source'
Suggestion: source
...nication channels have widespread they sources and able to know about the any incident...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: not
...re the world which makes them to access not not big cities also small towns and village...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'validated'.
Suggestion: validated
... newspapers responsible authorities are validate the truthfulness of news , but in case ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...es are validate the truthfulness of news , but in case of internet or social media...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99074074074 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67537355684 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543209876543 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2607728404 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.384615385 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216746250232 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869362750371 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794351307178 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121032727777 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694449682696 0.056905535591 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.