Some say that young people are not suitable for secision making positions in governments,others however disagree.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is well known fact that higher the positions, greater are the responsibilities and risk associated. A segment of society believes that young people should not be allowed to take responsibilities of these positions, while others feel contended that age cannot be a constraining factor for such positions. This essay will discuss about the positive as well as negative consequences of recruiting young people for decision making government services in upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, many masses believe that the young people are aggressive, impatient and less experienced. They can make a wrong decision which can be proved fatal for everyone. For instance, in the case of militancy in the country, a General would be more effective in mitigating the situation as compared to a lieutenant who has recently graduated. Moreover, they believe that young people, due to lack of field experience are unable to manage large teams and are unaware of government operatons, procedures and regulations. Their induction in key positions can have catastrophic effects on the growth of the country.
On the other hand, many orthers feel thatyoung people are more energetic, have fresh thinking and innovative ideas and they can drastically improve the nation's positions. Their enthusiasm and dedication and nonpareil with older people. One good illustartion here is that, one of the facebook co-founder Mark Zukerberg was worked as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) incorpprated many innovative ideas and taken many decisions in Facebook development and become great succes. It prove that youngster have developed skill to handle hard decisions. So that they can also participate in governments's decision making role.
To conclude, although, youths will bring new ideas to a government decision making process, such positions should be given to older persons who are experienced and are able to view issues critically from all angles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-22 | Ravindersidhu | 84 | view |
- Some employers think that formal academic qualification are more important than life experience and personal qualities when they look for an employee why is its case Is it apositive or negative development 61
- You are going on a month training programme to the UK and know that the head of the course would like one of the participants to be the social events organiser write a letter to the training Organiser expressing your intrest in the role requesting more in 87
- You have seen an advertisement from a couple who live in Australia for someone to teach their two children your language for a year Write a letter to the couple In your letter Explain why you think you would be suitable for the job Say what else you could 73
- In the future more people will choose to go on holiday in their own country and not travel abroad on holiday Do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays more and more older people who are looking for work have to compete with younger people for the same jobs What problem does this cause What are the possible solutions 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 473, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'proves'?
Suggestion: proves
...development and become great succes. It prove that youngster have developed skill to ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...veloped skill to handle hard decisions. So that they can also participate in government...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47157190635 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9934960052 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.861419595 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.857142857 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174570655193 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055989223585 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581186654514 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107435772535 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518176807119 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.