Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones. Is this a positive development or a negative development?
It is admitted that mobile phones are impacting on the studies of children. Therefore, many schools have banned the usage of phones on campus. In my opinion, I support that this is a positive development as a limitation on the access of phones can improve learning at schools.
Restriction on mobile phones in the class can reduce distractions and improve studies. In other words, a constant urge to check the notifications on the phone might lose the attention, which deliberately distracts the minds of students from academics. If the usage of mobiles in the classroom is banned, students could easily emphasize on their study. An article published in ‘The Guardian’ revealed the schools that had restricted the mobiles on campus, improved the performance of their students in academics for about 90% as compared to those institutes, where phones are allowed. Therefore, a complete ban on access to mobile phones at schools is always beneficial.
Furthermore, curtailment on the phones at the campus can promote the wellbeing of students. Because of the limited addiction to mobiles, children can not only attracted to the playground but also spend their free lectures and lunchtime with their classmates. This will engage them in healthier activities, despite sitting alone with a cell phone. Take high schools of Norway, for example, the blanket ban on mobile phones has triggered the students towards sports such as basketball and hockey, which, thereby, made them all-rounders. Hence, a strict restriction on phones by schools is advantageous as students themselves cannot mark the line on their mobile usage.
In conclusion, I believe that a complete ban on phones for students can be a better option to enforce by schools because this will enhance their focus to study and study-related activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 160, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'can' requires base form of the verb: 'attract'
Suggestion: attract
...ction to mobiles, children can not only attracted to the playground but also spend their ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28965517241 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92672299528 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562068965517 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4137979169 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.571428571 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289368699945 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107582402033 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605803271462 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188367459595 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867567185993 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.