Of late, the usage of electronic devices like mobile phones have mushroomed everywhere, even in educational institutions. Phones have been banned by limited number of institutes, which I believe can be proved advantageous for better learning and well-being of the educatees. This essay, in the forthcoming paragraphs, shall discuss the same.
First of all, restricting the use of such devices can assist a student to focus more academically as a without phone still will be less distractions and they can study with your mind focused on their subject. To cite an example, if it keeps on buzzing in between lectures, the attention will thereby be divided as who is the message or notification it is. Thus, restraining tutees from such gadgets is a boon.
Apart from this, does not at this restriction help the children to improve their health? Surely, it does as they can socialise and play with their peers, if they do not have mobile phones in their hands. Activities like football, basketball, group discussions can be done among kids resulting in improving their physical and mental well-being. That is why, it is better for them to stay away from distracting devices.
To conclude, although it might be good to have a phone for safety purposes, to learn effectively and for better holistic development of a child such devices should not be allowed in educational campuses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun distractions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ically as a without phone still will be less distractions and they can study with yo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, still, thus, well, apart from, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1160.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 228.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08771929825 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89270263454 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7273558251 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.454545455 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176590925873 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602735718858 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506810230483 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103909985439 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030529467584 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.