Will the area, which should be bestowed with pecuniary aid by the authorities has been the most talked about topic in every nation. A group of individuals who find that the usage of government’s funds should be towards wildlife protection, while others, on the contrary, believe that other sectors like education health needs funding. I; however feel that there should be a balance between both. This essay, in the forthcoming paragraphs, will discuss both opinions along with mine.
First of all, wildlife needs attention as animals are getting extinct at an unprecedented rate. Money should be spent to make a safe space with adequate climate and living conditions for fun. Sahara national bird century, for instance, played a crucial role in preserving some species of birds which were about to disappear from the world. Does, by such national parks, wild creatures can be protected.
On the other hand, to ameliorate the condition of any nation, inhabitants applying that more educational institutions should be set up by the authorities as more the schools and colleges, more the library literacy rate soar, which consequently will boost a countries status. To cite an example, government funded institution will encourage educators to learn at a nominal fees, so that they can brighten the nation’s name by becoming scientists, researchers, to name but a few. Hence, for betterment of a country, monetary aid should be rendered to improve the education system.
I; on the other hand, Teen that there should be a balance between both. Nothing out of the two can be fully ignored. Government can provide scholarships to those who excel in studies rather than providing free education to all. Does, the money saved can be used on wildlife protection areas. Hence, I feel a plan should be made to distribute government funds.
To conclude, although it is the need of the hour to protect the extinction of animals, education system of a nation needs funding from the authorities to have a literate nation. I; however, feel that nearly equal amount of funds should bestowed to both.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...e soar, which consequently will boost a countries status. To cite an example, government ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, so, while, for instance, i feel, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1195335277 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77912766195 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588921282799 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2624640883 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5555555556 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0555555556 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189375619724 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633712179395 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523777099947 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106623093749 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503476229374 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.