Nowadays many people change jobs quite regularly rather than working in the one company for their entire careers Why do you think this is happening How can companies keep their workers

Job hopping, which is rife, has been burgeoning at an unprecedented rate in this day and age. Workers prefer new jobs for better remuneration in lieu of sticking to their old stagnant paid job. This essay, in the forthcoming paragraphs, will delve the same along with the possibilities with which employers can bind their employees.

At the outset, company workers often look for new jobs for better pay rate than their previous job. The more the experience they will get by working in different jobs and in varied companies, the more they are likely to get higher packages. For instance, if a worker works for a particular enterprise for 5 year, he would gain experience and knowledge through which he can look for jobs with remuneration higher than their previous ones. Thus, to coin more money, job hopping is done.

On the other hand, can the employers do something to not let go off their workers? Certainly they can, by bestowing them incentives. The wage should be reconsidered every year, rewards should be rendered to the most valuable person of the firm. Free concert tickets or pecuniary aid should be provided to the employee of the month. Hence, by doing so employees will no longer feel the need to look for new job opportunities.

To conclude, although job hopping can be proved benificial to the employees in tems of money, workers can work in same companies for their lifetime by making some conscious efforts like reconsideration of pay or bestowing awards.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, so, thus, for instance, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1234.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91633466135 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7503432271 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581673306773 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5392225677 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9230769231 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283093948781 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999029858036 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080391377118 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176810800849 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047384987455 0.056905535591 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.