Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on their planets and messages should be sent to contact them Other scientists think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Many scientists believe there are intelligent living creatures on other planets in the Universe. Also, there are scientists who deny aliens' existing. The camp of persons believing in aliens is divided into optimists who desire contact with new intelligent life and pessimists who afraid of negative effects on whole humanity and the Earth.
One the one hand, attracting the attention of aliens could be significantly beneficial for us. Sharing new technologies and resources could be an excellent solution for permanently increasing problems on Earth. Probably, intelligent creatures know how to eliminate the shortage of fresh water and food, how to cure awful diseases and how to avoid natural disasters. Moreover, sending messages to space and trying to contact with aliens can save millions of dollars instead of spending on the development of spaceships and exploration of the Universe.
On the other hand, the pessimists can be right regarding the hazard to humanity. No one knows for sure what development level the aliens have reached. The intelligent form of life can be very primitive or superior. In the first case, it will not answer us and we never know about its existing. In the second case, greatly developed creatures can desire to use us and our planet for their needs because of the fact that humanity will be very primitive for them and not important to preservation.
In my opinion, despite the possible danger humanity should continue trying to contact other intelligent kinds of lives in the Universe. People should take the risk in hope of positive consequences. While the debates about positive and negative effects from messaging to space are continuing, the alien existing doesn’t prove yet.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (4 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...o use us and our planet for their needs because of the fact that humanity will be very primitive for the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hem and not important to preservation. In my opinion, despite the possible danger...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, while, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24187725632 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82742705109 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5559566787 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.236178216 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191467475239 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669973102311 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054758240115 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110148419046 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249035903121 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.