Some young people are leaving the countryside to live in cities and towns, leaving only old people in the countryside. Why do think this is? Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
In this era of globalization, urban migration is a growing trend among youngsters and due to this rapid movement, an old population is left in the suburbs. This essay will first discuss the job opportunities and high-class facilities available in cities as primary reasons behind this phenomenon and later, admits that this is a negative development for both an individual and society.
Due to industrialization and advancement in technology, the urban areas offer numerous employment in various fields as compared to rural areas where career growth and opportunities are limited. Therefore, rural inhabitants are becoming city dwellers for the betterment of their career. In addition to this, metropolitans have all the modern facilities available such as well-equipped academic institutions, hospitals, shopping centres and transportation. These readily available facilities are also one of the compelling reasons to shift to the cities. For instance, every year IT professionals to hunt highly paid jobs and students to pursue higher degrees migrate to metro cities.
Although it first seems to be a positive development, it has deeper negative effects in the long-term. Firstly, the fastest-growing population in modern cities paves the way to land shortage for construction, road congestion and environmental pollution because of the heavy use of private vehicles. Therefore, the overall health of an individual living in urban terrains is at high risk. For example, every year 20% of urban mortality rate is due to pulmonary problems and inhaling toxic air daily. Moreover, the young generation is becoming self-centred and feel disconnected from their parents. This is because of the communication gap between parents and children who are staying apart and living different lives, which is certainly a negative for an individual and society as a whole.
To conclude, the active job market and urban facilities are major reasons to move-in to the big cities but it is predicted that associated side-effects on the environment and human life are quite threatening in long-run.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52647975078 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23631784073 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588785046729 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4581352545 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.714285714 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128102559654 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406141590073 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450385343856 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0773184453274 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630770747327 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.