In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
While many developments took place in the field of agriculture, countless people are fighting with hunger in various parts of the world. This essay will examine the reasons and suggest possible solutions to tackle this issue.
First of all, new technologies such as advanced irrigation system, effective fertilizers and insecticides have proven themselves in producing high yield crops throughout the year though they are quite expensive which will affect at the final price of the product. For example, in Sudan, the climate does not support growth of wheat and the need for expensive agricultural technologies is inevitable. This means that the price of bread will increase dramatically after the government subsidy will be lifted in 2010. As a result, not all the breadwinners would be able to satisfy their families hunger. In addition, some governments aim for financial profits through exporting most of the crops rather than achieving self-satisfaction, subsequently making it difficult for local citizens to get reasonably priced food.
However, one way of handling this problem can be through government subsidization of agriculture which will lessen the cost of food products making them accessible for all economical levels. This will dispense the unnecessary fancy agricultural equipment as well. Furthermore, the government should put restrictions on exporting activity to make sure that there are plenty for people and finally they should seek alternate techniques that can produce abounds of crops with minimum costs.
In conclusion, advanced technologies in the agricultural sector somehow failed to eradicate the hunger problem of many people because of its price. The government subsidy can be a possible solution to this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 223, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ugh they are quite expensive which will affect at the final price of the product. For exa...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57677902622 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02321670508 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629213483146 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2461511528 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.083333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193293446222 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082805811913 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654131114039 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15114813824 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708744383278 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.