The invention of technology in agriculture shall be followed by the well-being of farmer and inhabitant. Because technologies are built to making utilization for the human race. But, in actual condition, there are some countries which can not support their main food by themselves. This essay will give some explanation about this problem and inform good ways to solve it.
To begin with, the most reason is that the improvement of technology is not faster than the number of population in the world. The deficit of main food emerges because the number of production in agriculture cannot be managed to full-fill demand in the market so that the price goes high. Furthermore, the salary of inhabitant remains stable than the price of the main food is not achievable. For example in Africa, the number of population is not controlled. There is no regulation to control the bomber population but the number of main foods is just a little although there are some technologies to support the production of agriculture.
To solve this problem, the revelation of technology shall be supported by the role of the government. There are some explanations to minimize the deficiency of food. Firstly, the information about new technology must be informed to the farmer about how to manage and increase production when the stock is limitless. The number of food must be adjusted to be greater than demand. Secondly, to make the farmer more productive, the management of stock exchange (export-import) shall be regulated to making advantage for the farmer. For example, in the harvest season, the import shall be stopped. Thirdly, the price of the product shall be controlled in the range of stability. By this way, it will make the price of the main food to be stable and achievable.
In conclusion, the improvement of technology will be nothing if the role of the government to support the advancement does not occupy by using some regulation and sharing information.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04615384615 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93465883625 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458461538462 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 12.0 2.52805611222 475% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6011363473 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1111111111 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146500858824 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522161623152 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515825031774 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943576552168 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517246866312 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.