Since 30 years ago, the development of technologies spread-out in all aspects, especially in transportation. Attending transportation technologies has brought masses to an easy access to moveable from one place to others even though it is in long distance. However, one of the most types of public transportation which bring to a traffic jam is a personal car.
To begin with, people choose a private car because this type of transportation offers a convenience access about time and cost. Some communities have valued public transportation that is not up-to-date such as in facility and environment. Moreover, this option isn’t achievable because not all region can be covered by this model of transportation. If there are many people thinking clearly the same about this problem, this why many automobiles in the big city cause a traffic jam.
Basically, the improvement of technology shall be controlled by the regulation. The number of automobiles causes a traffic jam because many people out of there have more than one car in each family. And there is no management to stop this condition. But, this problem can be solved by constructed more public facilities which this development can exchange human thinking. For example, the usage of the personal car shall be given more tax and then public transportation is constructed to give easy access and low cost. Another, Building of infrastructure, such as alternative highway, can dissolve the density of traffic in work hours.
In conclusion, the utilization of car ownership is affected by the readiness of public transportation and government regulation. By maintain and build public facilities, this condition will change the culture to start using public transportation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'easy access'.
Suggestion: easy access
...tion technologies has brought masses to an easy access to moveable from one place to others ev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, then, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37226277372 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28885378513 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554744525547 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.6752097257 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.1333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233104257355 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782491478967 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737375432918 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135831853787 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716860205029 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.