Owing to technological revolution in agriculture, the world is currently producing more than one and a half times enough to feed the entire planet. However, many people are still being affected by poverty and hunger. This essay will discuss the causes of food insecurity and the solutions to this problem.
Recent reports state that as a result of advancements in agriculture, the world is producing enough food to feed 10 billion people, yet a significant number still live in poverty and hunger. We can attribute this anormally to global warming and resulting climatic disasters as well as economics. For instance, due to drought and earthquakes many are devoid of food which is a basic commodity and eventually suffer from hunger and malnutrition. For example, Somalia has faced several droughts leading to poor harvest and food instability. Moreover, some people are resource-poor and therefore cannot access food that is healthy and fresh as it is expensive. Consequently, they do without.
Food security can be achieved by not only providing food aid to drought stricken areas but also providing irrigating systems that will mitigate the effects of drought. Thus people can enjoy improved crop yields. In addition, food should be made as a human right globally, thus ensuring that food manufacturers and governments alike provide food that is affordable to people.
In conclusion, innovations In agriculture such as irrigation systems can be utilised to counteract effects of drought and food can also be brought to people at affordable prices, thus ensuring that people can have access to the basic commodity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...oblem. Recent reports state that as a results I advancements in agriculture, the worl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...affordable to people. In conclusion, innovations In agriculture such as irrig...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29457364341 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92816054054 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593023255814 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.412935262 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.076923077 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215457814334 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762767868813 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591304685367 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142799032677 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603888446725 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.