It is believed that many people all over the world starve for food despite of the advancements made in agricultural sector. Nowadays with the introduction of various machineries, the quantity and quality of crops has increased, this has resulted in the rise in the prices of food as a result most of the people below poverty line are suffering from hunger.
With the introduction of latest agricultural equipments and fertilizers, the yield from farming has improved as compared to the past. Consequently, the markets are now flourished with variety of food in large quantities. However, these enhancements and the rise in competition in the agricultural sector has resulted in the hike in the prices of the crops, as a result, the poor people become incapable of buying these commodities. Therefore, most of these people are dying from starvation. To illustrate, the owner of the farm bought an equipment and has to employ labour to use that equipment, to overcome these cost he will increase the prices of his yield.
There are two ways to solve this problem, firstly, in order to control the rate of people dying from hunger, government needs to implement proper checks to ensure food is being supplied to poorer people at a subsidized price. Secondly, various NGO's need to step in to create awareness among the rest of the public to don't waste food and provide the remaining food to any malnourished person near you.
To conclude, the enhancements in the farming sector has resulted in the hike of prices of crops because of which poor people are not able to buy food, but with the involvement of government and NGO's it could be made possible to provide subsidized food to them and ensure nobody remains hungry.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 23, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...ing from hunger. With the introduction of latest agricultural equipments and fertilizers...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...areness among the rest of the public to dont waste food and provide the remaining fo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91408934708 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79620369298 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518900343643 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.404751297 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137639127577 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586198579158 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622654701261 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925251858515 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500766169212 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.