In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Even though the agriculture has seen enormous advancements in recent years, yet people are starving for food. Agricultural practices such as cultivation, harvesting are dominated by today’s technology which has increased the production and enabled food industries to introduce new food types such as vegan, gluten-free, fat-free, but the irony is that despite these measures still, people die of hunger. This essay will discuss the possible reasons behind this problem and will put forward relevant solutions.
Firstly, there is no denying that technology has boosted the agricultural production, but at the same time, it has inflated food prices. Latest and expensive machinery are used for farming, and to compensate for this investment, raw vegetables and goods are sold at higher prices to the public. This rise in the prices makes it unaffordable for some people. For example, Punjab and Haryana in India produce a hefty amount of grains using modern and costly technology. When introduced, farmers sold products at the same cost but encountered damaging losses, hence eventually they raised their prices to compensate for the investments. Secondly, many countries export food products to other countries in abundance for a higher profit which causes a shortage in their own country.
There are myriad of measures that can reduce this suffering. At the foremost, the government should intervene to provide subsidy on agricultural machinery, thereby reducing initial setup cost which will bind the shooting prices. Furthermore, limits on exporting agricultural production are desirable to control sale to other countries. Last but not the least, the government should provide financial aid to the poor especially those who are below the poverty line so that they can purchase basic food for their survival.
To pen down the compendium, implementing the new technology alone would not turn up fruitful unless stringent actions are not incorporated by the authorities in trading practices, and financial support is not provided to farmers and poor.
Comments
How much reliable is this
How much reliable is this score compared to real marking in the IELTS exam?
I have same question. Is it
I have same question. Is it possible one day after you take IELTS exam and tell us the score? so we can compare.
It is a good essay. I give it
It is a good essay. I give it 7.5 out of 9 too.
Do you guys know, what is the
Do you guys know, what is the best way to increase writing score?
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, second, secondly, so, still, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5141955836 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89733509407 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608832807571 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4003286883 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.857142857 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101216452932 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404264406756 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498656959179 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0555760449252 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438130908278 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.