Students in school and university learn far more by lessons with their teachers compared to other sources (example: television and internet). Do you agree or disagree?
In today’s technologically advanced world, where internet and television has become backbone of the society. Albeit such a development, certain section of the society believes that teachers still are most prominent source of learning for high school and university students. Whereas, others have contrasting views. In my opinion, teachers plays most crucial part in student’s education and can never have an alternative.
Firstly, it is undeniable fact that from the time a child is admitted into school, teachers acts as main source of ingraining important knowledge in them and provides a strong foundation in early stages of life. Secondly, the academic concepts and teachings provided by teachers are streamlined and well directed with a focus of achieving academic curriculum. Furthermore, mentors are a reliable and authentic source of information unlike the Internet. Thirdly, teachers provides individual attention to each candidate, as they are well aware of each of their shortcomings. Whereas, internet and TV doesn’t always provide appropriate content. More importantly, teachers adds up to the learning process by including examinations, evaluations and assignments which are fundamental means of catalyzing the learning process.
On the other hand, No doubt that Internet and media contents are beneficial to society, as it opens the gates to infinite amount of information. However, such plethora of information may lead to confusion and learning of unauthentic information. Furthermore, information over web is published by immature people having almost nil or very less information. Therefore, such a source considered to be unreliable and inefficient. Additionally, internet and TV are considered to be a major source of time killers in adolescents, as they provide numerous means of distractions, such as social networking, movies etc. as a result, students may waste time on computer instead of actual learning.
To conclude, teachers and mentors were, are and will always be primary source of learning no matter how fast the technology grows. However, advanced means of learning such as internet are additional ways acting as add-on to personal training but cannot completely replace them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...or high school and university students. Whereas, others have contrasting views. In my o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, third, thirdly, well, whereas, no doubt, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70359281437 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19777439053 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595808383234 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7038645634 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.833333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7222222222 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238148303312 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650125967106 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320011217898 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136660111665 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397331044072 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.