In some countries, the number of shootings increase because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In many countries, a number of mortalities related to shootings have been surging year on year, and there are ample evidences to conclude that these disturbing incidents are direct result of allowing to keep arms at home.
There are numerous reasons to prove that having weapons at home can lead to fatal incidents. Children, firstly, are most vulnerable to such deadly equipment. Having not enough maturity, they often do not have the requisite knowledge to handle them. Out of curiosity, adolescents tend to explore these weapons without the knowledge of their guardians and can lead to devastating accidents. For instance, a recent report from the government of New Delhi concluded that, approximately 150 – 155 accidents are directly related to domestic weapons.
Domestic disputes, secondly, can also be aggravated and can sometimes result in shootings. For example, a heated conversation or fight between a couple can sometimes get physical. However, at that moment of anger, if one of them have access to a weapon, then they might end-up killing the other. Therefore, some people may lose control over rage and shot the other person and realize his mistake later, which obviously, would be too late. Domestic conflicts, above all, are intensifying in today’s time, due to increased divergence, racial discrimination and surging immigration. Therefore, having easy access to fatal weapons is unhealthy for a nation. Newzealand, for instance, has been shocked by a recent deadly terrorist attack where a young white supremacist brutally killed 50 innocent people by firing at them. This would not have been possible for him had the government imposed stricter gun policies.
From the above argument, it can be concluded that having guns or any other weapons at home undoubtedly increases the chances of domestic killings and accidents. Therefore, it is high time for the government to impose strict restrictions on weapons. Otherwise, normal citizens feel that they are living in insecure and vulnerable society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-07 | tontan53251@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-07 | azhar46 | 84 | view |
| 2019-03-08 | srini7961 | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-05 | sharanyam | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | Madhumuppa | 89 | view |
- Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas.To what extent do you agree or disagre 78
- Many governments in the world spend large amounts of money on art, which helps to improve the quality of people’s lives. However, governments should spend money on other things rather than art. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 84
- You recently received a letter from a friend asking for advice about whether to go to college or try to get a job. You think he/she should get a job. 89
- People living in the 21st century have a better quality of life than the previous centuries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Today the quality of life in large cities is decreasing Discuss the causes and solutions 41
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'keeping'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: keeping
...incidents are direct result of allowing to keep arms at home. There are numerous re...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing in insecure and vulnerable society.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38244514107 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86992607284 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617554858934 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8461540968 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 3.9879759519 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158757260003 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467742679549 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527667975564 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106769272943 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312422404842 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.