Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In today’s time, where businesses and corporates give enormous importance to personal aspects of potential employees. Some section of the society believes that gathering such information related to their leisure activities and marital status is beneficial, whereas others have contrasting views. In my opinion, it is absolutely important for businesses to have such data, as it helps in improving the business opportunities and to take better decisions.
Firstly, one of the most fundamental need of knowing the leisure activities is that they help the employer to decide if the candidate fits into a particular role or not. For instance, if a media company is seeking for a post of a journalist, then it is obvious that the candidate must simply love reading. Additionally, being a journalist requires a person to be highly active, which imply having hobbies involving physical activity will be an add-on, such an information would definitely help an employer to take better decisions. Secondly, certain job profiles require employees to relocate on very short notice and unmarried candidates fits best in such roles. Therefore, having to know the marital status becomes incumbent on employers.
On the other hand, other people are of opinion that hobbies and relationship status are matters of personal choices and are not related to professional career. Furthermore, asking marital status to some people may make them feel offended, as they might be actively seeking a partner for very longtime without success. More importantly, the information provided by people on resumes or during interviews are more often not reliable, as they may just copy and paste the content or tell lies during an interview. Therefore, relying on such information to hire someone may sometimes be flawed.
To conclude, in today’s competitive world, employers seek for candidates who are the best fit for a role. To do this, they require elaborate information including personal and professional life. Furthermore, to make smart business decisions such as employee relocation, it is crucial to know the marital status of an employee, this will be helpful for both the organization and the employee in longer run.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, whereas, for instance, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38328530259 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99480347328 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559077809798 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1459196554 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.533333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1333333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294046449207 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939609021908 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507741973752 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179519979861 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644612390596 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.