Success is often measured by wealth and material belongings. Do you think wealth the best measure of success? What makes a successful person?
In this commercial world, everything is measured by money and everyone tries to give values to anything on based on money. Success is also measured often in monetary aspects. When someone says about a successful person, a picture of a person with logs of money in bank accounts and lots of material belongings comes to our mind.
Is the wealth is the best measure of success ? Without a doubt, it is the best measure of a successful businessman / businesswoman. No one will say a bankrupt businessman as a successful person. However this cannot be applied for everyone , because their aims, aspects and ambitions are different. An academic scholar's aim is to do the studies well, a teacher's aim is to produce well-behaved, educated citizens to the society and the aim of a priest is to maintain a civilized society. In these examples money or material belongings do not matter at all. Secondly even if a person has enough money but doesn't contribute for the betterment of the society, we cannot say that person is a successful person. Further if that person has earned the wealth illegally, that person also not a successful person.
A successful person is the one who achieve his or her targets, aims, fulfill the dreams without breaking the law or harming to the society. The aims can be tangible or intangible. Some people contribute and work for the society to make it a better place.
To conclude wealth is not the best method to measure the success of a person. The wealth and material belongings are counted for business persons, but the traits like character, attitude, behavior are also used to measure the success of a person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 300, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'belongings'' or 'belonging's'?
Suggestion: belongings'; belonging's
...y in bank accounts and lots of material belongings comes to our mind. Is the wealth is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...upt businessman as a successful person. However this cannot be applied for everyone , b...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ever this cannot be applied for everyone , because their aims, aspects and ambitio...
^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'examples'' or 'example's'?
Suggestion: examples'; example's
... maintain a civilized society. In these examples money or material belongings do not mat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 603, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...y even if a person has enough money but doesnt contribute for the betterment of the so...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84697508897 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7786576446 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516014234875 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9775985909 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.125 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.46665145281 0.244688304435 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195199418963 0.084324248473 231% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184595869367 0.0667982634062 276% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296663632327 0.151304729494 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135309212387 0.056905535591 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.