All the parents want the best opportunities for their children. There are some people who think that schools should teach children skills but others think having a range of subjects is better for a children’s future. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
The parents wish that their children will have a better life than them and they work tirelessly to provide everything for their kids to achieve this. In order to have a better life, the parents want the best opportunities for their children. Since the kids start their early life at school, the parents think that school should teach skills for the students while other parents think learning verity of subjects is the best for the students. We need to consider the both sides before coming to a conclusion.
Having good communication skills, negotiation skills, interpersonal relationship skills, technical skills and management skills are few from major skills that a person should have in order to thrive in modern life style. Even without a solid knowledge in some particular fields like marketing, anyone can open doors to success, if he or she possess these skills. They can gain the knowledge later. Majority learn these skills when they go to the commercial society and of the students can learn them at school before mixing with the commercial world, it will be huge advantage for them.
There are some areas or fields that basic knowledge weigh more than skills like engineering, medicine, accounting and science and technology. If a person wishes to follow the path in areas like these, that person needs to work hard on gaining the basic knowledge and more advanced knowledge first. Then only he/she can learn other skills which might be helpful along the particular path. Having a good range of subjects at school is necessary to have a solid basic knowledge and which leads to more advanced knowledge later on.
So, in conclusion, I think it is necessary to learn skills and have a good range of subjects at schools. The parents and the teachers must help the children to identify their individual skills or area of interest and depending on that the children can chose which specific subjects or skills that they should learn in order to have best opportunities in future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'solid knowledge'.
Suggestion: solid knowledge
...rive in modern life style. Even without a solid knowledge in some particular fields like marketin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'possesses'.
Suggestion: possesses
...can open doors to success, if he or she possess these skills. They can gain the knowled...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'learns'.
Suggestion: learns
... can gain the knowledge later. Majority learn these skills when they go to the commer...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 328, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the best'.
Suggestion: have the best
...ills that they should learn in order to have best opportunities in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...arn in order to have best opportunities in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, while, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9671641791 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52694986239 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477611940299 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2213506039 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.857142857 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348259189708 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128616538224 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128905072451 0.0667982634062 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234447144508 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164919630197 0.056905535591 290% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.