Technology has invaded privacy Is it a blessing or a curse

Essay topics:

Technology has invaded privacy. Is it a blessing or a curse?

It is no secret that technology has become an integral part of lives. Few experts believe that technological advancement is unmeasurable. However, few experts term this progress as a curse, as it makes people vulnerable.
Firstly, we have become so comfortable with technology, that unknowingly, we have given it permission to invade our lives. Today, we are so dependable on technology that we use our mobile phones, tablets, and laptops to store our personal information like passwords, credit card numbers, and so on. In fact, this information can easily be hacked and can lead to monetary loss or leaking of confidential data. Furthermore, technology can also easily access our activities on social media, web browsers and our location all the time. This information if fallen in the wrong hands could lead to robbery, blackmailing or other malpractices. Thus, it is possible to say that technology is a blessing but at the same time, it has opened the gateway for cybercrimes and hacking.
Secondly, even though technology has attacked our privacy, it has also helped in making our lives easier. For instance, technology has helped to enforce “Law and Order” in the country by solving hideous crime and ensuring that people abide by the law. For example, surveillance cameras on the roads have helped reduce road accidents, as people who falter on following traffic rules are penalised. Therefore, it is clear to state that technology surveillance has helped in reducing misconduct in society.
To recapitulate, I partially agree that technology has made it easy for the world to peep into our lives. However, we need to be mindful of not sharing personal information on social media or storing it on our devices.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ial media or storing it on our devices.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14946619217 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97072676503 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583629893238 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2669811303 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.4666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143660125265 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509038995145 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427863607419 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811323066367 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227282377341 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ial media or storing it on our devices.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14946619217 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97072676503 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583629893238 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2669811303 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.4666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143660125265 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509038995145 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427863607419 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811323066367 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227282377341 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.