Many young people are leaving their homes in rural areas to study or work in the cities.
What are the reasons?
Do the advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages?
Over the last couple of years, we have seen a large influx of young people from rural areas moving to cities because of lack of opportunities in rural areas. Some experts believe that this development has more disadvantages than advantages, personally I agree. This essay will discuss both the sides using examples to demonstrate points and prove arguments.
On the one hand, there is ample evidence that shows that moving to big cities is beneficial for young people. The central reason behind this is twofold, firstly, big cities provides employment opportunities as there are many multinational companies who want to hire young talents. Secondly, young people move to big cities to pursue further studies in Management, Science or Economics from well renowned Universities which are not present in rural areas. For example, recent empirical research by the Oxford University demonstrated that 90% of young people residing in rural areas post their graduation move to big cities for further studies or employment purpose. Therefore, it is conclusively clear that young people relocate to big cities for fruitful opportunities, and to progress in life so that they can meet their family’s financial needs.
On the other hand, large inflow of people in cities creates various issues for rural and big cities. Migrate of young talents leads to decline in skill labour, thus hampering the development and growth of rural areas. Also, due to large amount of people moving to big cities creates traffic congestion leading to rise in pollution levels of cities. Furthermore, the cities experiences a rise in housing prices making it difficult for middle class people to afford a house. For example, an extensive study by the UK Government showed that many well-known big cities like Mumbai and Bangalore over last couple of years have seen a rise in people moving thus making city congested. Thus, it is possible to state beyond doubt that the disadvantages outweigh advantages.
From the arguments and examples given I firmly believe that young talents moving to big cities creates a brain drain for rural areas. Hence, the government needs to work towards providing opportunities to people in rural areas.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24507042254 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74613937952 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529577464789 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8359428626 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.375 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1875 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23590292427 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877160956703 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363311185487 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153121859841 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255605810995 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.