Some people think that the Olympics is no longer important in the 21st century. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Experts throughout both the developing and developed world would have debated whether Olympics event is important or is no longer important. Personally, I strongly agree that Olympics is a great platform to unite the countries. This essay will argue both the sides, using examples from the Oxford University to demonstrate points and prove arguments.
On the one hand there is ample evidence that Olympics is beneficial to the players and the hosting country. The central reason behind this is twofold, firstly, there are many talented athletes across the globe whose talent gets unnoticed. Olympics provides the platform to such athletes to showcase their talents and achieve fame for themselves and their country. Also, sports is a great medium to create harmony and reduce political tension between rival countries. Secondly, the country that host Olympics event, gains popularity and attracts tourist which in turn accelerates per capita income of the economy. For example, recent empirical research by the UK Government demonstrated that the tourism industry of countries that hosted Olympics increase by 40% as the media showcase the countries major attraction. Therefore it is conclusively clear that Olympics is just not an international sport event, but also has several benefits attached to it.
On the other hand the host country has to ensure security of athletes, coaches, their families and of tourists as such international event is prone to terrorist attack like bomb blast or shoot outs. Also, some people believe that countries spend a large amount of money in making stadiums in order to host such a large scale event which is organized only once in 4 years. However, after the event the stadium is vacant and additional money is spend on yearly basis for its maintenance, which otherwise could have been spend for more alarming situations like drought, epidemics, water crisis and so on. For example, an extensive study by Oxford University showed that developing countries in order to attract attention spend money on constructing stadiums for Olympic and after the event are unable to maintain the stadium due to lack of funds. Thus it is possible to state beyond doubt that international event like Olympics attract lot of cost.
From the arguments and examples given I firmly believe that, even though hosting Olympics is an expensive affair, but the advantages of the event outweighs the disadvantages. It is predicted that the international sports events will increasingly grow in importance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 817, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...howcase the countries major attraction. Therefore it is conclusively clear that Olympics ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...adium is vacant and additional money is spend on yearly basis for its maintenance, wh...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 520, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...enance, which otherwise could have been spend for more alarming situations like droug...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 846, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ntain the stadium due to lack of funds. Thus it is possible to state beyond doubt th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3042394015 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74330990192 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56608478803 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5693663512 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.117647059 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5882352941 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0958203246311 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341309474627 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318395777254 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0659003172533 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469643330091 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.