Many sports players advertise sports-related products. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this?
It is an incontrovertible truth that sports players has humongous fan falling across the globe. Today, many sports companies like to choose players as their brand ambassadors. Few people believe that are pros as well cons of this. In the following paragraphs I shall present advantages and disadvantages of sports players advertising sports products.
Firstly, sports has always been an integral part of people’s life. However, sports has gained more importance over the last couple of years, thanks to the international sports events like Olympics, World cup, Formulae 1 racing and so on. Recent Harvard research states, that most of the youths in any country are sports fanatic, and like to follow foot-steps of their favourite sports player. Looking at the research, sports companies like to hire sports players as their mascot and signs up a contract for endorsing their products. Today, we see a quite few advertisement in which players share their stories or reviews of the company products and suggest the consumers to buy their products. Such advertisement help to attract more customers and in turn helps the company to accelerate their profits. Furthermore, by buying the sports product, it encourages the buyer to use it which in turn helps him/her to stay fit. A recent research conducted by Indian government states that people who follow a sports player not only purchases the sports gears that the player endorses but also use the gear on regular basis.
Conversely, there negative sides to the above. Athletes, who are weightlifters, wrestlers or boxers consume steroids or protein that are harmful to health. Guileless youth who fan follow the athletes and also would like to pursue career in the above mentioned sports end up taking the harmful medicine or protein powder which not only affects their physical health but also their mental health. A recent research done by Sports Federation of India, showcase that 4 out 5 youth end up taking harmful medicine like steroid as they like to achieve fast result; but end up risking their life.
To recapitulate, there are positives and negatives, however, sports players have to be mindful of product they are endorsing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 836, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...eir profits. Furthermore, by buying the sports product, it encourages the buyer to use...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1008, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...ernment states that people who follow a sports player not only purchases the sports ge...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 58, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... negative sides to the above. Athletes, who are weightlifters, wrestlers or boxers cons...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 478, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'end' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'ends'.
Suggestion: ends
...n of India, showcase that 4 out 5 youth end up taking harmful medicine like steroid...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20505617978 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72029642221 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547752808989 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0752210048 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9411764706 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64705882353 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368237427253 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133018669076 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121049402694 0.0667982634062 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245629609035 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165472198649 0.056905535591 291% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.