The tendency of human being to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and consumer goods. To what extent do you agree?
It is the human behavior to copy each other, and this is more popular in fashion clothes and consumer goods. I strongly agree with this statement as each one of us have a different taste in buying things.
Firstly, we love to buy things which others have bought just to keep our status in the society. We always like to follow the person who is more prosperous than us, so that we can also have the same respect as that person. Each one of us is a fan of some of the famous personality in our County, so this way we also want to look appealing and beautiful the ways our idols are looking. When we tried to dress up like them, we would get the confidence. Our dressing sense should be good enough to impress people, as it will decide our status and our family background. On top, it will also determine our knowledge about matching a different color. So we tend to follow each other to look more appealing and beautiful.
On the other hand, we do imitate each other with regards to consumer goods to show off. People who are well-off tend to buy expensive things. Even though we cannot afford, we will purchase a costly phone to maintain our status in the society. We want to purchase items which are obtained by our friends and other people we are working. We want to feel superior in class and status symbol. We do not want to give a chance to the people saying we cannot afford expensive items.
To conclude, we copy each other while buying fashion clothes along with expensive goods, even though we cannot afford them, but to maintain our status in the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...that person. Each one of us is a fan of some of the famous personality in our County, so th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...el superior in class and status symbol. We do not want to give a chance to the peo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, so, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44982698962 5.12529762239 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25978844985 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494809688581 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0911178327 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.375 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4375 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0940646569646 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415216915184 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810756842468 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103932881133 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0964238222259 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.23 12.4159519038 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.