There are more cars on the roads these days and more accidents. As a result, some politicians have suggested that people should take regular driving tests throughout their lives, rather than one single test.
What do you think are the advantages of repeat driving tests? Do these outweigh the disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It has become necessary that people commute daily in the modern world and usage of cars has grown exponentially when compared to the past. This has been resulting in more accidents. In order to reduce this plight, some statesmen suggest that the driving licence should be issues with an expiry and the drivers have to take regular tests to get them renewed. I believe this a positive idea to make people constantly aware of the rules and also help traffic departments make amendments to rules as necessary
To begin with, the licence is issued for a lifetime in most of the countries. So, the holders who have acquired a licence in back old days will not be aware of the new rules implemented timely. Due to this, these drivers may be confused by the modern signposts. Consequently, making them to break few rules and resulting in accidents. If they are asked to take the driving test regularly every two years, they would be able to drive safely and responsibly following the rules
Added to this, if the licence expiry is set to short period, the government and traffic departments can constantly monitor on the number of active drivers and the number of cars hitting the roads on a regular basis. With this data, a better planning of roads that are safer and adding of further safety or traffic rules can be developed
To recapitulate, though regular tests may cause some inconvenience, it has a definite benefit that people drive responsibly in accordance with the rules avoiding accidents
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
... confused by the modern sign signposts. Consequently making them to break few rules and resu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'safer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: safer
...ta, a better planning of roads that are more safer and adding of further safety or traffic...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...safety or traffic rules can be developed The drawbacks with this model would be t...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...accidents or at least reducing the cause
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, may, so, as to, at least, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81666666667 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56855125617 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 150.842080778 49.4020404114 305% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 160.555555556 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.3333333333 20.7667163134 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199594803583 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920128332253 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630865777055 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11454077177 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452432205964 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.