There is no future for public transport, because travelling by car is so much more convenient.
nowadays, many people think that travelling by car is better than travelling by public transport due to it's convenient and there is no future for public transport. this views soon became a major sources of debatement, in my opinion, I definitely disagree with this point
First, there is no denying that private transport such as car is very convenient because it's flexible, but, that more car, more traffic congestion. this can be explained that if everyone all using cars to transfer, the exhausted come from cars will affect the environment badly. For instance, Beijing, the capital of China is one of the most polluted cities in the world. The reason is the amount of exhausted that came from the traffic jam made heir environment is affected worse and worse
Another reason is the cost of the car. not everyone has enough money to buy a car for their self, so communal means of transport is necessary . The finance for a car is costly and it's not a suitable choice for people who have an average level of salary.
Beside that emissions from car cause several phenomenons, it is clear that we can't deny all the convenient, accommodate of car. if we have a car, we can easy control our time and travel anywhere if we like.
In conclusion, a car is an user-friendly transport, but public transport have their own merits too, so both have their own future and their development to service human.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nowadays
nowadays, many people think that travelling by c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...here is no future for public transport. this views soon became a major sources of de...
^^^^
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...that more car, more traffic congestion. this can be explained that if everyone all u...
^^^^
Line 2, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...exhausted that came from the traffic jam made heir environment is affected worse ...
^^
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Not
... Another reason is the cost of the car. not everyone has enough money to buy a car ...
^^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...communal means of transport is necessary . The finance for a car is costly and its...
^^
Line 4, column 79, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...everal phenomenons, it is clear that we cant deny all the convenient, accommodate of...
^^^^
Line 4, column 128, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...all the convenient, accommodate of car. if we have a car, we can easy control our ...
^^
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...re if we like. In conclusion, a car is an user-friendly transport, but public tra...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1156.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73770491803 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63787174573 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581967213115 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5905340576 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.6 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4171622991 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145485027296 0.084324248473 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107307655072 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202241385516 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058140287869 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.