Many people in different country follow a trend of throwing away the products early, even though they can be utilized for a long run. A major reason in doing so is the availability and affordability of the products in the market. Such trend has lead to environmental damage to a great extent, in order to solve this problem, individuals should come to the term of using products wisely.
With the rise in the population size, the demand and supply in number of products has increases. More and more products are being bought by people across the globe, which has indirectly increased the waste generation. The products that people use for a short amount of time and then throw away are usually the electronic items like mobiles, laptops and televisions. As the advent of technology, new gadgets are introduced in the market every day, attracting a number of customers to buy them and this results in discarding their old ones. Another reason is people are lazy to repair a product or instrument when has crashed. Also, sometimes buying a new item is cheaper than repairing the older one and it can be time saving as well.
Such action results in number of problems for the people as well as for the surroundings. Firstly, it damages the environment, as these waste piles up in the landfills contributing to more garbage production. The e-waste produced are mostly non-degradable, that remains in the soil for a long period of time leading to soil pollution. Also, when an electronic item is incinerated, it generates fumes with toxic substance, that leads to health issues when inhaled. In order to prevent further damage to the environment, it is important for everyone to understand the importance of recycling their e-waste, and also limit the waste production of electronic devices as much as possible.
In conclusion, as day by day new inventions with better technology will keep coming in the market, creating a want for people to buy such products and throw their older ones. This will affect the environment as this discarded products will end up in the dump yard leading to soil and air pollution. Necessary steps like recycling is only the viable option to overcome this situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...le, that remains in the soil for a long period of time leading to soil pollution. Also, when a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, then, well, as for, in conclusion, as well as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94339622642 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7993597521 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522911051213 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5784624403 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.882352941 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8235294118 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193791760805 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060904630082 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799658863997 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119180896304 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059893001101 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.