These days people in some countries are living in a “throw-away” society, which means people use things in a short time and then throw them away. Causes and problems.
There is little room for doubt that the living trend of purchasing and using products in only short amount of time has gained tremendous popularity in recent years. Some reasons for this phenomenon would be appropriately explained, leading to the interpretation of its impacts on the society.
There are two main factors leading to the unprecedented growth of this new living style. First, with the great help of technology, goods are able to be manufactured at the fast pace with a more reasonable price. For example, in the past, while people had to spend several years collecting money to possess a motorbike, now they only need around a year to save up, live economically and can be capable of getting a fairly good one. Another cause of this phenomenon comes from the globalization with the penetration of many cultures. By feeding the crowd with up-to-the-minute trends on a regular basis, it has caused one person a feeling of dissatisfaction and falling behind if he owns one product for too long.
From a general perspective, this issue has many drawbacks. First, the most transparent problem caused by the this lifestyle is the environmental pollution.When many people throwing a large number of products in a short time, they have directly overworked the national garbage managing system, pushing it to the verge of malfunctioning and destroying the ecosystem as a consequence. To be worse, this way of living can retard the economy development of one country. In order to fulfill the need of customers to replace products in a constant time, the manufacturers are likely to decrease the quality and the lifespan of the products, making it difficult for those goods to meet the demand of some world-topping importing markets like America, Japan or some EU nations.
In conclusion, though a variety of reasons results in the negative impact of the “throw-away” life style on daily life, there will obviously be many penalties that society could do to eliminate this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etation of its impacts on the society. There are two main factors leading to th...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d if he owns one product for too long. From a general perspective, this issue h...
^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
... the most transparent problem caused by the this lifestyle is the environmental pollutio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: When
...ifestyle is the environmental pollution.When many people throwing a large number of ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...tal pollution.When many people throwing a large number of products in a short time, they have dir...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ike America, Japan or some EU nations. In conclusion, though a variety of reaso...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10975609756 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15674094358 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603658536585 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.1500997497 49.4020404114 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.666666667 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170502933818 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518788446135 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461186874648 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10513207301 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360839066706 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.