Today more and more cities are being rebuilt and redesigned in order to be modernized. What are advantages and disadvantages of this trend.
Owing to housing as well as traffic problems in old cities, authorities have been renovating these urban areas to provide better amenities and lifestyle to the people. While the redesigning of cities influenced its inhabitants in a very positive way, however, at the same time, its few disadvantages cannot be overlooked. This essay will highlight both merits and demerits of this trend.
First and foremost, there are number of changes like conversion of horizontal housing infrastructure into vertical one, widening of roads, amelioration of sewage system by installing big pipes and all have been done to tackle the issues faced by most of the old cities. Firstly, as with increasing population, there is a need of more houses for people who are coming to cities to earn their livelihood. However, horizontal construction of houses needs more space and to counteract this, construction of vertical buildings and or skyscrapers is gaining ground. Furthermore, more people in city means more vehicles on roads which further catalyze the need of wider roads. Hence, widening the existing roads is also a major part of the renovation which tackle road congestion effectively.
On the contrary, there are some unfavorable effects of this trend on society. Firstly, generally people are living in communities in old cities, whereas, the renovation scatter that community people in different places which really impact the social satisfaction of individual as he might be losing relationships with their neighbors and other community members. Moreover, in modern high rise apartments, people have to bear more cost as these building are more expensive as compare to their old houses.
To conclude, although there are few negative aspects associated with modernization of cities, advantages are increasingly more and it an inevitable change to meet the needs of citizens of these cities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, moreover, really, so, well, whereas, while, as to, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37837837838 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9554458777 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601351351351 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9042029113 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.666666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5833333333 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222332754134 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805002075418 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557212509304 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122551080075 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265385882443 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.