Today people spend more time travelling to work than before. Some people suggest employers should allow employees to do some work home. Do you think that advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, some employees spend enormous time in travelling to reach their organizations. In many cases people get tired due to hectic traffic and air pollution, which affects their productivity in leaps and bounds. When there is any emergency situations, staff feel great pain to reach their office and it also creates fear among family members how they will reach home safely. In the following passage, I will explain both the sides of this ongoing trend.
During hectic weather conditions it is tedious for employees to come to office and continue day-to-day operations. In such circumstances, work from home option can be used to provide constant support without compromising their safety. For instance, during recent flood in Chennai, many employers requested their staff to work from home, so that their regular routines are not halted. Moreover, when employee’s dependents are unwell, they can concentrate both work as well as the health of their family members. In addition, it also helps employers to save huge operating cost. Thus, it is believed, work from home culture give great flexibility to both firms and to their staffs.
When employees do work from home they can be easily distracted and their productivity is severely impacted. Furthermore, if there is any technical glitch then it will be tough for them to work efficiently. Additionally, there are chances for some employees not able to attend offline meeting which can create miscommunication among peers. Therefore, it is assumed, work from home option impacts the productivity of any organization in various ways.
To sum up, as proverb says, “work is worship”. Employers require their regular work routines to continue during all unexpected situations, then work from home option provides help their cause in many ways. Considering the above facets positives outweighs negatives in all aspects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 469, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... unwell, they can concentrate both work as well as the health of their family members. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, as well as, in many cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39189189189 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91318098438 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3756185236 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8823529412 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4117647059 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210945165917 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704049578465 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462009071175 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130487297884 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193971029569 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.