In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many different industries have been looking more for practical know-how in candidates than for their academic abilities while selecting members of their staff. while, it is more worthwhile to possess pertinent skills and experience of an industry to be successful, the theoretical understanding of the field in which one will work cannot be entirely ignored.
First of all, an employee is only as good as his ability to function with efficiency in the workplace than his fancy knowledge on theories. if all the members of the staff are experts in executing things in their own domain, there is more likelihood of an improved team performance and enhanced productivity of an enterprise. Moreover, a sound academic qualification but poor application techniques doesn't fare well for an individual and his company as the academic knowledge, which is mostly theoretical, will often seem to impede his initiatives to make things work and moving. many PhDs and post-doctorates have a very poor track record of excellence in industries.
However, the importance of having a good comprehension of the concepts and theories cannot be dismissed altogether. A strong conceptual base in a subject coupled with a sound technical and practical adaptability will often get the most out of an employee working for an organization. it is no surprising to see why good brands of hospitals and other sensitive sectors still look for higher qualification when hiring personnel. For example, a technician is often supervised by an Anesthesiologist and not allowed to administer tranquilizers on a patient on his own in spite of the great manual dexterity due to expert knowledge of the later should there be complications. if despite inadequate assimilation of quintessential concepts and thorough research, a company somehow brings out a product, no matter how great the working knowledge, renders it vulnerable.
In conclusion, better trade and professional skills make an individual more potent in the workforce. however, companies cannot overlook potential employees with better qualifications. it is the right mix of the two which might eventually be more attractive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'Many'.
Suggestion: Many
Many different industries have been looking more for p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...while selecting members of their staff. while, it is more worthwhile to possess perti...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will work cannot be entirely ignored. First of all, an employee is only as goo...
^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...e than his fancy knowledge on theories. if all the members of the staff are expert...
^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ication but poor application techniques doesnt fare well for an individual and his com...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 581, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...iatives to make things work and moving. many PhDs and post-doctorates have a very po...
^^^^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...n employee working for an organization. it is no surprising to see why good brands...
^^
Line 5, column 672, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...he later should there be complications. if despite inadequate assimilation of quin...
^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ndividual more potent in the workforce. however, companies cannot overlook potential em...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...l employees with better qualifications. it is the right mix of the two which might...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, well, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40949554896 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30582177222 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569732937685 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4085015211 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.214285714 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0907471900926 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338139477546 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0226825453433 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0625799298408 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233539725475 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.