Transport
Some people think an international car-free day is an effective way to reduce air pollution. Others think there are more effective ways to do this.
Discuss both sides and give our opinion.
One of the highly controversial issues today relates to that of air contamination. Some people believe that implementation of an international car-free day would be an efficient method of reducing of air pollution, whereas others claim that there are other, more effective, methods to do this. This essay will discuss why implementing of such day is a particularly positive idea, but why other methods, including implementation of strict laws for factories is a much more beneficial solution in terms of global changes.
Some people state that the problem of contaminated air could be effectively solved by implementing an international non-cars day, since cars are accounted for the largest contaminators of air on planet Earth. In other words, gas-powered vehicles emit exhaust fumes, which immensely contaminate air, and by forbidding them at least for one day in a year could make a great contribution in air purification. To illustrate, in 2016, Germany introduced a ‘Bike to work’ day every other month encouraging its citizens to use bicycles to commute to work. As a result, the percentage of pollution in the air indicated a steady decline, resulting in a dramatic drop from 60% to 25%.
However, I am inclined to believe that the major air contaminator is factories, which emit the sulfur-dioxide in tremendous proportions, and the best method to clean the air is to introduce a range of highly strict policies restricting the amount of dangerous sulfur-dioxide that can be released from them. For instance, Singapore has held the first place for having the cleanest air for 10 previous years due to introducing in 2009 a strict policy regarding the fumes exhausted from the country’s factories and plants.
To sum up, it is argued by some whether reducing the number of cars on the roads could help eliminate the problem of polluted air. This essay discussed why eliminating the problem of contaminated air by introducing a car-free day is a positive idea, but why restricting the emission of sulfur-dioxide from plants and factories is a much more beneficial idea, as this issue needs a more global approach.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...illustrate, in 2016, Germany introduced a 'Bike to work' day every othe...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, regarding, so, whereas, at least, for instance, as a result, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19942196532 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23439330893 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543352601156 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.936410253 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.545454545 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4545454545 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243164892811 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960501743316 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0971725817619 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154405537249 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863153815774 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.