Travelling abroad is regarded as a valuable and good activity for young people. But some people think it takes too much time and money. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Opinions differ as to whether it is a fruitful and good for young people to travel overseas, or it entails excessive amount of time and funds. This essay intends to discuss both the viewpoints. I, however, would side with the latter viewpoint on this matter.
In terms of exploring career options and getting acquainted with foreign cultures, visiting abroad tends to be a useful activity for youngsters. Individuals can be enlightened with widespread career options by visiting to other countries. For them, it can reap benefits in terms of employment, if they could find job with high remunerations. Even, by exploring other cultures and language, adolescents can widen their horizons of knowledge. During their trips to other countries, for example, they are likely to meet natives, live with them and can be familiar with their traditions and dialects. They can get rid from their monotonous life as well as potentially yield positive results for their career prospectus.
I, nevertheless, believe that foreign visits not only require huge funds, but also consume plenty of time. Youngsters have to take a number of leaves from their work and dispense extensive amount of funds for their itineraries to abroad. Costly air travel, high hotel rentals and food expenses are to just name a few and to cater these expenses, people spend their all savings and at times ended up in debt. This amount of money can be utilised otherwise for making an asset or investing either for earning revenue from mutual funds or financial markets, or investing to acquire new skills which will further open the doors of new opportunities. Hence, it is apparent why sometimes enjoying foreign trips can be irrational decision for ones.
In conclusion, despite the benefits of career options and widening knowledge for youngsters through travelling abroad, I think drawbacks in terms of financial affairs and time can be too dire to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Opinions differ as to whether it is a fruitful and good for young peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15286624204 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71459408671 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62101910828 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2092660526 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.866666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175097387071 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605265770966 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621336808249 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129688378695 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574705138671 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.