The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live, think and behave. However, some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
People of yester years have conventional ways for behaving, thinking and spending their life. I consummately accord with the view that these methods of nourishment are not handy to make young adults for the contemporary world due to two main reasons.
It is argued that it will not prove to be beneficial for young adults to embrace lifestyle, thoughts and behaviour of the past. I consummately accord with the view for two main reasons.
Conventional techniques of living are no more fruitful because of drastic changes in the employment sector. In previous times, where it was possible to acquire well paid government job after matriculation or senior secondary education, nowadays, owing to fierce competition in the market, ones need to equip themselves with higher degrees in order to grab the job. Recruitment in civil services is good paradigm of this where in earlier times aspirants could possibly awarded with the employment after clearing 10th standard. These days, on the other hand, graduation is minimum requirement to appear for any post which pertains to civil services.
Changes in family structure are possibly another significant cause why past time nurturing methods are outdated. Living in families, which are dispersed into nuclear units, is prevalent nowadays. People like to have privacy, less interference and want to take their decisions in their lives. In contrast, earlier individuals staying in extended families and parents quite often used to take decisions on behalf of their children. Moreover, Cohabitating, single parent and step families are also coming into existence. In previous times, these kinds of families were not at all accepted. Hence, it is apparent why conventional methods of life are no longer in success for raising youngsters in modern life.
In conclusion, it could be reiterated that because of changes in employment market and family composition, conventional skills of life cannot prove to be healthy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...f this where in earlier times aspirants could possibly awarded with the employment after clear...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 469, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'award'
Suggestion: award
... earlier times aspirants could possibly awarded with the employment after clearing 10th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
... possibly another significant cause why past time nurturing methods are outdated. Living ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, moreover, second, so, well, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37216828479 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86234200421 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588996763754 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2815770583 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.75 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102292719876 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352506593136 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421735400166 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0574096218752 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416215698019 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.