The use of cell phones(mobile phones) has grown rapidly in the past few years. People use them for both business and personal reasons. What are the advantages and disadvantages of the widespread use of cell phones?
The use of smartphones has increased surprisingly to a higher level than in earlier years, and people are using them at their workplace and homes for various purposes. Although this technology has revolutionized the way of communication between people, it also brings some drawbacks.
On the positive side, there are several benefits of using smartphones. The first and foremost is that communication between people becomes easy and quick. Nowadays, we can connect with a person sitting in the other corner of the planet by dialling a set of few digits. Secondly, incorporation of internet facility in these phones has made people to get access to various websites, and to do video-calling. For instance, I usually prefer to read e-books and e-newspapers on my mobile phone than to read a printed version. I could also watch movies and videos streaming on it.
On the negative side, the major disadvantage is that people are suffering from addiction to this technology. In other words, people spend most of their time on these mobile phones and have little time available for other activities and family members. Consequently, they are being isolated from the outer world and living in a virtual world. Another drawback is the free access to pornographic websites and deadly games which might prove harmful for the children. Recently 53 children ended their life by playing "Pub G "game which is supposed to encourage players to do suicidal activities. Thus, this kind of technology has detrimental effects on society if not controlled timely.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that smartphones have facilitated overseas communication around the globe with video-calling, but it could have deadly effects on society if no restrictions being imposed on its safer usage.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29225352113 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0136134784 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612676056338 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0077770218 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.2 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19512459973 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533081922256 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616871649246 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106031411573 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716101394465 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.