The use of mobile phones in public places is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places, so mobile phones should be banned in the same way. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Increasing use mobile phones in public places has been credited to as asocial as smoking, so people argue about banning it at certain places. While I completely refute this notion as it not as objectionable offence as smoking, I believe that it should be banned in certain areas.
In my opinion, it should not be weighed in equivalent to smoking in terms of its unacceptability at public places. In the first place, while it has certain impacts on an individual, it is profoundly used and does not violate other’s privacy or health, unlike smoking. Secondly, people do not prefer to converse with strangers in public, rather, they surf the internet, talk or chat with their loved ones, when free. For instance, while waiting for a bus, people are often found using social media. For these reasons, I believe that mobile use in public cannot be termed antisocial like smoking.
While I support the use of these gadgets at public places, I feel their use should be barred in some places. People need to understand that its free use must be limited at certain areas where it is either mandated by the government or at some key sensitive areas such as road traffic or at hospitals and so on. The reason is that, these areas require decorum or secrecy, for maintaining fair practices, which is easily violated by public which results in accidents or violation of rules. In such cases, the barring of use of these gadgets is entirely justified.
In conclusion, I believe that although the usage of mobile phone publically is not offensive, but its use must be limited at certain places.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86446886447 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63250978028 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553113553114 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4930548948 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341062521681 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136583441596 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108912729915 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248088991309 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102574780635 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.