USING COMPUTER AND MOBILE FOR AUTOMATIC TRANSLATION.
WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES FOLLOWED BY YOUR OPINION.
The technology has replaced most of the things in our life with something which is smarter to ease up the burden. One such replacement has been made by the computer and cell phones for instant translation of languages which we are not aware. The essay will deal with both the advantages and disadvantages which will later be followed up by my opinion.
On the one hand, many people think that the technology has come as a blessing to us. Further, the technology has eradicated a barrier between people and has resulted in a direct relation and communication on spot between people with whom there was a barrier of language. Nowadays, many applications are available to help with translation. For instance, there is an application called instant Translation, with which you speak in your language and chose another language for the outcome and the result will be instant. Thus, the technology has benefited by removing the intermediaries and making a more intimate as well as personal connection.
On the other hand, there are some who believe that the technology cannot take place of a human professional translator as it lacks the emotions with which a thing is said. Undoubtedly, the result might be prompt but it cannot replace the actual translator. As long as machines do not become smart enough to replicate the translations in the same emotional sense, the machines cannot take place of a human being. For instance, some news are communicated in a specific emotional tone which the machines cannot reciprocate in the same sense. Therefore, the machines may be an instant solution but are not the smart solution for certain types of translation needs.
In conclusion, in my opinion, every development has advantages and disadvantages. However, everything depends upon the personal needs and objectives of the person who is using the tool for their own use. One has to be vigilant with their own needs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04088050314 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90790059031 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518867924528 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9365971003 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.1875 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152045711077 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046580544807 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555550589344 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095119181365 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464511026634 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.