Using a computer everyday can have more negative than positive effects on your children. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, teenagers spend most of the time on laptops which could have detrimental effect on them. In my opinion, using computer on daily basis can affect health and other activities of children.
There are several reasons why I would argue that using computer regularly would have negative impact than positive effect. Firstly, students performance would be affected if they spend their valuable time by playing games or watching videos online. Secondly, due to radiations emitted from laptop and screen resolution, adolescent’s health might get affected. Recently, in survey, it has been published that children under 15 are more affected by eye diseases, because of spending time on PC. Lastly, they can be prone to cyber crime if there is no parental control on teenagers and social networks and also there could be communication barrier between peers and families if used for long time.
On the other hand, knowledge of computer could be extremely positive for students. These young people would gain valuable experience by learning computer applications and software, which could help to build their self confidence and enhance their skills in future. Having such experience and skills on their CVs could greatly improve school leavers career prospects. For example, gaining information of Microsoft office and their applications might impress future employer.
In conclusion, I believe computers are helpful to youngsters, there are more negative effects than positive. It is acceptable that youngsters should use this device two or three times a week, but parents should be aware about unhealthy information on internet and video games addiction of their offspring.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted if they spend their valuable time by playing games or watching videos online....
^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...elf confidence and enhance their skills in future. Having such experience and skills on t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47692307692 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74439719726 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657692307692 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8661610656 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.538461538 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213641981397 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822362059011 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885843257399 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138430554793 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480622755749 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.