When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
With the inception of technology in everyday's life, it has become easier and time saving. With such pace of advancements in machines, some people concern that former will act as hinderance in our traditional skills and sooner they will die out. However i believe that these labor saving machines are actually helping us to keep our traditions alive, while beliefs without any logic will definitely die out and there is no need to save them.
Admittedly, internet is beautiful flower which blossom our society. By the appropriate use, traditions and cultures are spread all over the world. For an instance, Maharastra Government use internet to sell products made by local people and purchases were made from all over the world. Afterwards, people still prefer to buy hand made products then the one developed my machines. Due to this, they have high value economically and fundamentally, they are better in quality.
Indeed, technology is helping hand, but it can be a reason for death of many tradition methods. Socially, people do not spend enough time with each other and they prefer to use mobile phones to communicate with each other but it should also be noticed that in the rural areas, percentage of family fights has been decreased over an decade as external people do not interfere. This can be seen as positive in the change in trend of people.
Having dwelled on such thoughts, it is clear that technology is a saviour in the cruel world and every nation and establishment should spend more of their revenue on developing technology and should be prepare for the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...al skills and sooner they will die out. However i believe that these labor saving machi...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...s and sooner they will die out. However i believe that these labor saving machine...
^
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...f family fights has been decreased over an decade as external people do not interf...
^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'prepared'?
Suggestion: prepared
... on developing technology and should be prepare for the future.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, still, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96254681648 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64375971212 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625468164794 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4747236842 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.416666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145472115557 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474022289926 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402639740395 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785511121255 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639840224269 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.