It is often observed that architectural beauty can provide enhance the beauty and the art is utilized and implemented to create the unmatched appearance of edifices. However, a certain set of the population believes that the most vital part of the building is the objective of building it. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the forth mentioned statement and in this essay, I will describe more.
To commence with, from antiquity it has been marked with unique and strong monuments, which are an exemplary piece of art and strength. Furthermore, adding unwanted parts in the building can increase the price and time of construction that could sacrifice the security and leave aspects of vulnerability. In addition, a certain structure of buildings are their identity, for instance, temples, police stations, hospitals, making them complicated by adding decorations can make people unable to simply recognize them by a look. In a recent piece of article by prominent "The Times", around sixty percent of buildings which have artistic facades attract more people, so the maintenance should be done regularly. Consequently, while constructing a public building or area, keeping this perspective could be beneficial only for marts, public park, museums, and many more.
On the other hand, computer-aided designing appears to be remarkably profitable for engineers, who are now acceding the limitations of nature and presents a considerable craft. Apart from this, it is not inevitable the basic purpose of construction, if a building is looking good but unable to satisfy the purpose it is a waste. According to an empirical survey conducted by London's "Oxford University", ascertained that around fifty percent of government construction is not mended to attract the peoples, instead their individual motive is to provide adequate safety and security to the human and non-human resources. Certainly, some buildings do not need that much attention like general home, schools, hospitals, and many more.
To conclude, to construct a building just for the specific purpose fulfillment is surely satisfy the motive of the edifice, yet adding architectural advancement could only enhance the beauty by which a probable business profit could gain, although it will be without strength and security, also the construction cost and timing increased.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'satisfied'.
Suggestion: satisfied
... specific purpose fulfillment is surely satisfy the motive of the edifice, yet adding a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, look, so, while, apart from, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4904109589 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09864830488 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58904109589 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.971158678 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.153846154 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0769230769 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0788225342718 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0315186214219 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357742792023 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0506458256033 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275804430025 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.