Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender?
The issue of whether or not woman and man should be deprived certain jobs has grown in importance over the past few decades. Although this opinion initially seems inequality, some analysis will show that this manner would be superior.
It is obvious that women are more compliance than men. Admittedly, this characteristic leads to female be less proper for the management position. If a woman was a leader of a large population, it would be likely that she encounters with huge challenges. However, there has been a few numbers of females that have been able to cope with these difficult situations successfully throughout history. Hillary Clinton has been America president for 4 years and her performance cause to economic improvement in there.
Furthermore, masculine would be less gentle rather than women. Therefore, it is really reasonable that they less tend to work as a kindergarten teacher. This kind of career not only are not males willing to do but also do not suit their features. As a result, it is more possible that working in similar positions makes them depressed and provoke a sense of useless in them.
While it may correct to say that it is of quite unfair in the modern era to deter female or male from occupying in some particular jobs, the result would be appealing. Since they find more tranquil in their lives.
Overall, it can be said that it may be preferable to exclude gender from inappropriate works because it gives them an opportunity to play an accurate role in society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
The issue of whether or not woman and man should be deprived certai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 168, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ar jobs, the result would be appealing. Since they find more tranquil in their lives....
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y to play an accurate role in society.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, really, so, therefore, while, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89494163424 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76377463652 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645914396887 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2798786084 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8571428571 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137060112233 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418042020515 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038071752845 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0708298440412 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309754326827 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.