using advanced technology in agriculture such as chemical fertilizers and machinery has resulted in producing more food. some people, however, think these technologies have negative effects. what are the advantages and this advantages/
The issue of using advanced technology in agriculture has grown in importance over the past few decades. Although these methods have impacted on the quality of production negatively, they have brought benefits for farmers in terms of convenience and quickly. This essay will discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of technology like fertilizers and machinery in agriculture.
On the one hand, many commenters are of the view that there are advantages to using advanced technology. From their point of view, fertilizers lead products to put particle pollutants in store and it causes many diseases in human. It also mentioned recently, producing fruits and vegetables modified through genetic technology would bring unknown problems if scientists did not research them accurately. For example, research has shown that transfusion products are the main reason for creating the new allergen. As a result, the technology will exacerbate the privilege of unknown diseases and it will obligate the government to invest a great deal of money in order for the improvement of this situation.
On the other hand, there are who subscribe to view that using technology can bring several benefits. It is believed that to produce plenty of productions by tradition methods farmers should allocate many time and forces. While by using advanced machinery not only can farmers provide more productions in less time but also the workforce needed is less. Therefore it is worth to devote on
Overall, it can be said that the use of technological systems in agriculture has become incredibly in common. It is argued that the advantages include a huge amount of productions in less time with less workforce while it may cause many unknown diseases.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... but also the workforce needed is less. Therefore it is worth to devote on Overall, it c...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 4.92783505155 183% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 32.9175257732 61% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 26.3917525773 155% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.85567010309 182% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 937.175257732 157% => OK
No of words: 277.0 206.0 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29602888087 4.54256449028 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.78020617076 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90419245647 2.54303337028 114% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 127.690721649 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563176895307 0.622605031667 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 470.7 290.88556701 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.1190668531 44.8134815571 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.846153846 76.5299724578 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 16.8248392259 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 4.34317383033 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259672447635 0.216113520407 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906552041018 0.0766984524023 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619305859654 0.0603063233224 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161008210954 0.12726935374 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066365265417 0.0580467560999 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 8.37731958763 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 70.7449484536 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 7.45979381443 170% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 8.71597938144 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 41.2886597938 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.