using advanced technology in agriculture such as chemical fertilizers and machinery has resulted in producing more food. some people, however, think these technologies have negative effects. what are the advantages and this advantages/
The issue of using the advanced technology in agriculture has grown in importance over the past few decades. Although this methods have impacted on the quality of production negatively, they have brought benefits for farmers in terms of convenience and quickly. This essay will discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of the technology like fertilizers and machinery in the agriculture.
On the one hand, many commenters are of the view that there are advantages to using the advanced technology. From their point of view, fertilizers lead products to put particle pollutants in store and it causes many diseases in human. It also mentioned recently, producing fruits and vegetables modified through genetic technology would bring unknown problems if scientists did not research on them accurately. For example, research has shown that the transfusion products are main reason of creating the new allergen. As a result, the technology will exacerbate the privilege of unknown diseases and it will obligate government to invest a great deal of money in improvement of this situation.
On the other hand, there are who subscribe to view that using technology can bring several benefits. It is believed that to produce a plenty of production by tradition methods farmers should allocate many time and forces. While, by using advanced machinery not only can farmers provide more productions in less time but also the workforce needed is less. Therefore it is worth to devote on
Overall, it can be said that the usage of technological systems in agriculture has become incredibly in common. It is argued that the advantages include huge amount of production in less time with less workforce while it may cause of many unknown diseases.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nce over the past few decades. Although this methods have impacted on the quality of...
^^^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... but also the workforce needed is less. Therefore it is worth to devote on Overall, it c...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 4.92783505155 183% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 32.9175257732 61% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 26.3917525773 167% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.85567010309 233% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 937.175257732 157% => OK
No of words: 279.0 206.0 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26164874552 4.54256449028 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.78020617076 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89831435526 2.54303337028 114% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 127.690721649 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 290.88556701 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 23.9570621822 44.8134815571 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.923076923 76.5299724578 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 16.8248392259 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 4.34317383033 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25598623101 0.216113520407 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886987334904 0.0766984524023 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616716151266 0.0603063233224 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155777977694 0.12726935374 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670793494206 0.0580467560999 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 8.37731958763 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 70.7449484536 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 7.45979381443 170% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 8.71597938144 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 7.59969072165 117% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 41.2886597938 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 8.62886597938 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.