An individual can do nothing to help improve the environment; only government and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

An individual can do nothing to help improve the environment; only government and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The issue of improving the environment has grown in importance over the past few decades. Some people are of the view that this responsibility should be just carried out by governments and immense companies. It seems to me that conserving nature is of a monumental task that all levels of society should work side by side.
There are a number of commitments which have been taken by people due to environmental improvement. These range from separating out their wastes for recycling to using hybrid cars. These measurements not only do the environment keep safe but also ameliorate the hazards which are likely to endanger its condition. For example, by using degradable packing instead of plastic one neither releases harmful chemicals into the atmosphere nor cause soil erosion because of changing to fertilizer.
Furthermore, it is undeniable that governments and major companies play a main role in preserving the environment. Legislation should be adopted to improve the environment and it would be possible to punish offenders. For instance, authorities would impose a massive fine if people dropped their litters in the street. Besides that, they are able to promote individuals' awareness of the dangers that threaten the planet Earth through the media. Admittedly, large factories have the greatest impact on environmental pollution. These factories could minimize their dangerous wastes by processing them and prevent pollutant particle into water and air. As a result, waste management would help them to develop their appreciation for the environment.
Overall, it can be said that although politicians and large companies should assume a great burden in boosting nature, the role of ordinary people should not be neglected. I believe that each person is responsible and have to contribute to environmental development.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tribute to environmental development.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, so, for example, for instance, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46153846154 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03714755079 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632867132867 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2086842754 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134318615945 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038706447254 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350832808557 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0709130951307 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282381753305 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.