The younger generation is mainly responsible for the latest technological developments. How far do you agree?
Technology is usually evolving according to different people demands. Some individuals believe that younger generations have a conspicuous impact of such enhancements. In my point of view, I wholeheartedly disagree with that and this essay will explore the reasons of my opinion in further detail and before coming to a conclusion.
First of all, there is no doubt that most of the young adults or even children are the main users of the recent technology. As, they have a faster ability to familiarize themselves among various technologies such as tablets, very sophisticated PCs and advanced smart phones than other older generations. In contrast, that’s not mean by any words they have the superiority in developing the technology more than older people. The scientists ages at NASA as an example are vary, but the majority of them are above 40 years old which means they are not belonged to a younger generation. However, they have a great participation in discovering the space and improving our life.
Second of all, it’s irrefutable that there are plethora of successful young innovators who were working very hard to establish a new trend or enhance the current facilities. For instance, the founder of Apple company Stive Jobs was working at his own garage and he had a strong belief on his skills. As a result of impressive works, the company has eventually become the number one worldwide in the electrical field and contribute in developing the technology. On the contrary, lots of young people across the world are still depending on their families as well as communities to live, some of them have a negative attitude or even pessimistic. Thoses kind of young people are applying too much pressures on their societies. Therefore, the innovation and passion are not belonged to any particular age.
To sum up, although the younger people might be the most technology users, but that not means they create these technical enhancements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'age'.
Suggestion: age
... more than older people. The scientists ages at NASA as an example are vary, but the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'varied'.
Suggestion: varied
...ientists ages at NASA as an example are vary, but the majority of them are above 40 ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
..., lots of young people across the world are still depending on their families as well as communitie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 696, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...s kind of young people are applying too much pressures on their societies. Therefore...
^^^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey create these technical enhancements.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, in contrast, kind of, no doubt, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13395638629 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94412137341 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613707165109 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5619271072 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.866666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0666666667 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0848300812125 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0269342869714 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301514255515 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0559272176582 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251322243099 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.