By and large, Arts, Scientific research and Parks and public garden, are essentially to be promoted, if a society desires growth. There are a plethora of people who are in the conviction that in the face of economic crises, governments should cut of or at least reduce the art associated spending, while others take different points of view. The matter is subjective to the lens from which, one looks through. To the extent that my perspective is concerned, I accord with first group. Among countless reasons which give adherence to my opinion, I will delve into the most important ones.
First of all, art has seen to be able to survive, and even flourish more efficiently in some cases, in limitations. Since art in a subjective matter which can commence in variety of forms, the less money flow can't bring Annihilation upon it. Take book reading in mid-15th century at Iran for example. Though reading was absolutely being seen as a waste of time, the most elaborate and fascinating articles were produced at the time. Though the ascending trend would be definitely more sever in the presence of cash flow, but the absence of monetary support didn't restrict the inception of different art forms.
Secondly, art is not directly associated with human's wellbeing. Though the promotion of art at any form can have appealing effect on individuals spirit per say, but its absence wouldn't directly affect physiological wellbeing of man kind.in other hand, art can't defeat HIV or cancer, nor can prevent it from happening. Its effects at best, are not tangible in other words. Take cancer for example. Science May be able to provide a solution for those who are struggling with it and ease their pain or at least find a way to stop it from spreading. Public gardens can provide more oxygen and therefor limit the possibility of diseases like asthma. Where these elements can directly affect human kind's health, there is no room for art, which at its best can bring a feel of joy to individuals.
In short, all the aforementioned reasons and examples lead to the conclusion that if the government had to reduce its spending, among three choices that has been provided, it should be art.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 210, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...n variety of forms, the less money flow cant bring Annihilation upon it. Take book r...
^^^^
Line 2, column 558, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ow, but the absence of monetary support didnt restrict the inception of different art...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: PER_SE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'per se' (=by itself, by themselves)?
Suggestion: per se
... appealing effect on individuals spirit per say, but its absence wouldnt directly affec...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...viduals spirit per say, but its absence wouldnt directly affect physiological wellbeing...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ellbeing of man kind.in other hand, art cant defeat HIV or cancer, nor can prevent i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 693, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kinds'' or 'kind's'?
Suggestion: kinds'; kind's
...hese elements can directly affect human kinds health, there is no room for art, which...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 186, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...es that has been provided, it should be art.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, at least, for example, in short, by and large, first of all, in other words, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86595174263 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64947186071 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597855227882 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6941223633 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.833333333 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7222222222 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130250387499 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386450906906 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421727419284 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963331967459 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517279700127 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.