It goes without saying that in this progressive and sophisticated world where we live with the ever-increasing rate of technologies, usage of all kinds of vehicles, among which are trains, buses, and cars, is at its peak. A controversial question which is often raised in this area is whether the number of cars will increase in twenty years. Although some people are inclined towards the idea that the usage of cars will increase in future years, I think otherwise. In the ensuing paragraphs, I will try to provide some convincing reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
First and paramount reason which comes to my mind is that with the chronic increase in the price of oil and gas, it becomes more cost-effective using public transportation instead of personal cars. Automobiles use fossil fuels to operate, and the number of resources of these fuels is limited or remote to access, with this in mind, increasing the value and price of fuel is inevitable. Even though some persons might argue that electric cars can be replaced with traditional cars, it is implausible that in the next twenty years, electric cars become affordable, especially for the middle-class of society.
Another noteworthy reason that deserves some words here is that a lot of task in future can be done without the need to commute, thus using the cars will be limited to particular tasks. With the improvement of technology and emerge of robots and artificial intelligence, the role of human being will decrease in the operating tasks. Therefore, people can do their jobs indoor, and student can enrol classes online. With this in mind, commuting will decrease.
Last but not least, another reason for decreasing the number of cars concerns about environmental protection plans. Thanks to the world wide web and social media programs, governments and ecosystem agencies boosted people’s awareness of the impacts which fossil fuels have in polluting ecosystem, and a lot of people are willing to make a change. These activities bring about a much more concerned society and less usage of vehicles like personal cars.
To wrap it up, considering all the mentioned reasons, one can conclude that the number of cars will decline in future years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun task seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of tasks'.
Suggestion: a lot of tasks
...n that deserves some words here is that a lot of task in future can be done without the need ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10928961749 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84212372949 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546448087432 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3738807261 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.666666667 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.93333333333 5.45110844103 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135638925959 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513959411599 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392377947535 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811272980027 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410149632611 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.