Since the dawn of humanity, human beings tend to live in societies and communities. Being a leader among people, making a group and maintaining it is amongst the controversial topics debated by individuals. When it comes to this point, it is the question of many persons that what characteristics make a person a great leader. One particular standpoint is that leadership comes naturally. Personally speaking, I repudiate this idea. In what follows, I will delve into the most critical reasons to shed light on my viewpoint.
The first and foremost reason which comes to my mind is that families are of great importance in shaping the personality of their members. Managing, decision making, taking responsibility, and confidence, to name but a few, are among the traits of which leaders are in need. It goes without saying that children's mind is like a blank slate which can be shaped gradually. It is the family which can sow the seeds of various attributes in children's mind. To put it into a more vivid picture, assume two families, each family has a seven year-old-boy. The first family teaches the boy to take the responsibilities of his own work and manage his time and homework. They take his back in different conditions but rarely do they allow the boy to be noticed of their full-time attention. However, the second family always supports the boy and helps him in his work instead of allowing him to deal with the problems with his own abilities and make decisions. It is crystal clear that over the course of few years, the first boy is more likely to become a leader due to the fact that his family has established managing abilities and some other attributes of a great leader in his mindset.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that the ability to be a leader, just like other skills, can be learnt by practising and attending certain courses. Nowadays, there are plentiful courses in universities all over the world, and a lot of professionals convey their experiences through conferences and symposiums. One who wants to become a good leader can seize these opportunities, take lessons from these adept teachers, and practice establishing the features of a leader in his/ her personality. These characteristics, like every other skill, can thrive. By looking at the history of great leaders, one can notice that a lot of them had a good teacher. As a case in point, the leader of the Islamic revolution of Iran, Ayatollah Khomeini, was the student of Ayatollah Boroujerdi-one of the greatest and knowledgeable teachers of his era. Ayatollah Khomeini always said that he had learnt a lot of leadership lessons from his great teacher, and he ever tried to mirror his actions. By and large, the more one tries to flourish his leadership traits, the more s/he become successful in leading people.
To put everything in a nutshell, considering all the aforementioned reasons, we can conclude that leadership can be learnt and people can flourish their abilities to become a successful leader.
- TPO 5 integrated writing3
- TPO 35 independentDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.73
- Integrated Writing Task: Chaco Canyon: How the buildings were used? Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories discussed on the reading passage.90
- TPO3- It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Agree or not?80
- tpo 4 Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is warm or cold.80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, second, so, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2519.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 509.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9489194499 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94052474663 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50884086444 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 784.8 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0006038608 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.958333333 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2083333333 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.29166666667 5.45110844103 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131786532053 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416361646119 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433787019898 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872001989382 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293274873639 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.