All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
When asked about whether all unversity students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is, the vast majority of people believe that there is no need for students to learn history; Instead, university students should concentrate on their major courses like business or environmental science in order to become more professional in those field. But I hold a totally opposite view: it is indispensable for university students to take history courses regardless of their major field. My arguments are listed as follows.
First of all, attending history classes can boost students' competitiveness in job-hunting. As for why, that's mainly because history courses usually require students to cultivate their critical-thinking ability and the ability of sorting out useful information, which are both crucial capacities at work. To be more specific, if students take history curriculums, they might have to look through plenty of data in a relatively limited time. Therefore, as time goes by, they are likely to have the capacity of finding helpful information from hundreds of messages. Besides, university students may need to analyze some of the hisorical events and give their comments on them. Thus, they could develop your critical thinking skills by trying to analyze those events in a more comprehensive way. With those two abilities that most employers want their employees to have, students could become more competitive than others during job-seeking, increasing the possibility of getting hired by companies.
Second, university students can enlarge their interpersonal circles by taking history classes. If students only attend classes that are related to their major, they may only meet people who also study in that field, which will greatly confine their diversity of friends. Under this circumstance, after they graduate, if students are asked to do a history-related project in companies, they will not know what to do since they do not take that course at college and not have related interpersonal network, which may lower their working performance and thus hinder them from getting promotion. However, if all university students are required to attend this class, they will gather together due to this policy. As a result, a wonderful chance is provided for students to expand their outlook and make more friends from not only history major, but also others like chemistry, communication, psychology and so on.
To sum up, the conclusion can safely be drawn that taking history courses no matter what the major field is should become compulsory for all university students due to all the benefits it could provide for students after they graduate and enter into firms.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...etitiveness in job-hunting. As for why, thats mainly because history courses usually ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 613, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...university students may need to analyze some of the hisorical events and give their comment...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
... courses no matter what the major field is should become compulsory for all univer...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, thus, as for, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2300.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33642691415 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83250859795 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533642691415 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 724.5 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.6822877995 48.9658058833 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.75 100.406767564 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9375 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.496902231674 0.236089414692 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161096445561 0.076458572812 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152310923351 0.0737576698707 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.359695977892 0.150856017488 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154095277248 0.0645574589148 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 11.7677419355 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.